老地方冰果室交流區

:?::?::?::?::?::?::?::?::?::?::?::?::?::?::?::?::?::?::?::?::?::?:
Regarding to the Raid box, it seems slower than a single drive or software raid.
My questions are:

If I can use FireWire 400 or 800 drive + OS X Raid function, what is the advantage of using Accusys ACUTA 4 Raid?

Why the hardware raid is slower than software raid (os X built in)
According to my testing, I've tried in multiple G4 and G5 using 4 Externla FireWire 800 drives with OS x built Raid function. The result is a lof of faster than the test result of Accusys ACUTA 4.

The cost of the Accusys ACUTA is a lot of expensive than External FireWire 800 drive. Is it worthy to buy ACUTA? What is the advantage of it?

I am building up a Video Lab and I need to have a better Raid solution.
Please Help...

^_^

As to the Accuta 4, What is the purpose of using such a expensive system while the regular firewire 400 or firewire 800 drives can do the same work? Can anyone explain to me? I meant the Dollar per MB/sec is so high? How can you justify that? Can anyone help me answer this question? Thanks.

alexchen 寫:As to the Accuta 4, What is the purpose of using such a expensive system while the regular firewire 400 or firewire 800 drives can do the same work? Can anyone explain to me? I meant the Dollar per MB/sec is so high? How can you justify that? Can anyone help me answer this question? Thanks.

Please read this article:

http://www.baydel.com/tutorial.html

Personally, I'd love to see more cache on Accuta 4. 8MB or larger would be great for RAID performance. (Current version has 2MB cache)

Chester