Kodak DCS Pro SLR/n 小改款

[麻辣杯麵]

改款自 14n 的 Kodak DCS Pro SLR/n 對於原本令人詬病的雜訊有蠻大幅度的改進
而且 ISO 由 6-1600 也寫下了記錄
原廠所提供的幾張示範照還不錯，即使是高 ISO 的畫質仍舊保有一定水準
尤其是一張超低 ISO12 的教堂內部照片保留了相當多的暗部細節

[Faust]

哇......哇......哇......
無論色彩細節都表現相當不錯～尤其是色彩..令人驚嘆～
不過細節表現依然不及SIGMA SDX~

[麻辣杯麵]

色彩確實很棒！
我打開第一張新娘照時，第一個閃過腦袋的就是頗有菜味～

[oeyvind]

Let me quote someone in a SG forum on the new camera and 14n..

here isn't a free upgrade, it's expected to cost about US$1500 to upgrade. The new Pro/n is expected to retail at the old price of the original 14n, that of US$5000 list.

The existing 14n doesn't have a problem with sucky colours or soft images per se. The colours actually are better in many conditions than the other cameras I use. And the images are actually generally sharper than any other camera out there, because of the lack of an anti-aliasing filter, so I can't imagine anyone calling them soft. There is obscuring of low contrast detail because of the noise of the chip, but that is the one true problem the camera has. Not to be confused with soft images... the edges of this camera are sharper than any other DSLR out there currently.

Not at all, it's not a camera many people have and it also suffers from bad marketing issues. I'm lucky enough to have one and I love it to bits and I'd take it over a 1Ds in the studio. But anything other than ISO 80 (okay, maybe up to 160) and it becomes an unuseable camera. From the sample images the new camera certainly shares many highlights (no AA filter), and many drawbacks (still too much noise reduction going on, therefore still too noisy) as the old camera, but just having at least 1 stop more useable ISO makes the camera far more versatile. Kodak's samples are misleading though, they are mostly overexposed and therefore actually shot at a "lower" ISO.

[oeyvind]

Not good I must say, worse that my ASA1000

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/S ... 4F0164.HTM