星洲夜景

數位相機/攝影機討論,攝影作品之交流

版主: ross_ttbryanchangFaust

回覆文章
內容
發表人
頭像
oeyvind
嗜冰客
文章: 1990
註冊時間: 10/03/2001 1:01 am
來自: 大馬/星洲
聯繫:

星洲夜景

#1 文章 oeyvind »

Took these just now... was too busy chasing the lightning missed the most of the nice dusk sky...

圖檔
Lightning over Clark Quay, abt 1924hrs SGT

圖檔
Raffles Place Skyscrapers & Boat Quay, abt 1930hrs SGT

圖檔
Raffles Place Skyscrapers & Boat Quay, abt 1931hrs SGT

圖檔
Raffles Place Skyscrapers & Boat Quay, abt 1934hrs SGT

圖檔
Raffles Place Skyscrapers & Boat Quay, abt 1935hrs SGT

圖檔
Junction of Hill Street & River Valley Rd, abt 1947hrs SGT

Taken with EOS 1D, EF 16-35mm L

P.S. Must really admit that CMOS is a lot better than CCD in long exposure.
頭像
Chao, the good one
嗜冰客
文章: 1082
註冊時間: 08/21/2001 1:01 am
來自: Bright Side of the Moon
聯繫:

#2 文章 Chao, the good one »

為何夜景看來有些不真實?
頭像
oeyvind
嗜冰客
文章: 1990
註冊時間: 10/03/2001 1:01 am
來自: 大馬/星洲
聯繫:

#3 文章 oeyvind »

Chao, the good one 寫:為何夜景看來有些不真實?
Why not? Dusk is very short, if you missed it, u missed it. BTW, these are long exposure shots.

P.S. BTW, with the right tools and technique.... anyone of us can take these... ;)
頭像
Faust
討論區管理員
文章: 4120
註冊時間: 01/16/2002 1:01 am
來自: Taiwan/Taipei

#4 文章 Faust »

圖檔

這張曝光過度的地方(原本白色的地方)顏色出問題了..
相對的絕對和絕對的絕對絕對是不同的--相對上來說.
頭像
oeyvind
嗜冰客
文章: 1990
註冊時間: 10/03/2001 1:01 am
來自: 大馬/星洲
聯繫:

#5 文章 oeyvind »

I agree the highlight is blown but I but stress the color is OK, dusk in the tropics is VERY BRIEF and short. only 1 min if can be totally different color.
回覆文章