那就請把anandtech用ab做stress test的連結貼這裡，好讓我去砸店......janusng 寫:
閣下捧出來的 Anandtech 文章，還不是使用 ab 來測試 Tiger 嗎？結論也還不是基於 ab 嗎？閣下當時有沒有因為自己把它搬出來，而笑翻了呢？
我接受你的道歉，也接受你不後悔說了這句話！比卡超 寫:
You may got piss off for this message. I can apologize for my rudeness but I don't regret to say it.
1. anandtech is a authority on benchmarking。Maybe they are not experienced in OS X，but they have their credit on their past. And regarding to mySQL performance, I believe their methodology，and the test result is creditable.You behavious really do not match your technical experience. How can a experince technical player agree with that Anandtech article and inviting us to review it? Just this point, your behavious tell me you are "小白"。
2. For page 7, 8, the reasoning is beyond my part of understanding regarding to OS X, but linux is under my knowledge domain, and it's ok in that article. 我承認這樣的引述有時候會有問題，我也可以為此道歉。But most of the time in my experience, I can refer Anandtech's article without hesitation.
Yes, the achievement in the past means nothing to my future. So, I can apology again.Frankly speaking, all those guys you mentioned and all achievement you have done in Taiwan has no meaning to me and it won't prove you are smart or overcome your fault on referring a problematic article.
I accept your definition of 小白. About why I didn't go to Cupertino, yes, there was a chance at 1997. But at that time, Apple is about to sink, no one knows the part of Steve Jobs, so I switch to another software company. Nothing to lose or regret, I have worked hard and earned my salary, married and had a baby, and trying to explore my career.BTW, I found I have a bit mis-understand about "小白“
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/小白
Under that explaination your are not really a “小白", you are just someone not verified the source correctness before referring it. Beside, putting your resume on this forum won't help. Your friend is your friend, doesn't means you are good too. If you are, why can't u go with them to Cupertino?
